Why I Oppose hanging Kasab


I am opposed to the death penalty. That makes me appear obnoxious to many, since the death penalty is often handed out to people who have committed serious crimes. I was opposed to the hanging of Dhananjay Chatterjee, not because I believed he was innocent, but because he was guilty, but death penalty is not a deterrent but an articulation of the eye-for-an-eye “principle”. In fact the one category of people who are hanged though innocent are the fighters on the class struggle front. When Kista Gour and Bhumaiah were hanged, or when, back in the 40s the Kayyur martyrs died, left wing activists knew that the crime involved was really a simple one – refusing to allow the ruling class to rule without putting up a resistance. Such people nether appeal for mercy, nor does one expect the state to show any mercy to them. Hanging them and calling someone like them for discussion and then killing that person (remember a man named Azad?) are all the same.
It is a more complicated case with Kasab. He was the representative of another state, or its covert arm, doing damage, killing innocent people. He was duly convicted by a court of law, and the death penalty was upheld by the Supreme Court. Absolutely correct. The problem lies in the argument that once the Supreme Court has upheld his conviction he has to be hanged and there should be no mercy. My point is, the question of mercy is only applicable to such cases. If he had not been found guilty by all the layers of judiciary, there would have been no death penalty to uphold and no mercy petition etc. If Kasab had been granted a mercy reprieve from hanging, he could still have been kept in jail for life. It is unlikely that he would have reformed (though strange things have very occasionally happened). But we would have been a more civilised society, not a blood thirsty one.
It has been argued that he was a criminal and therefore he deserved to die. In that case, so did Lyndon Johnson, who intensified the Vietnam War. So did Winston Churchill, who, on being told that there was a severe food shortage in Eastern India in 1943, asked why in that case Gandhi was still alive, and who refused to stop the moving out of food from that area. (This resulted in the Bengal Famine and the death of between one and three million people.) So do all leaders of Israel, who have been waging a murderous war against the Palestinians for decades. Are we going to demand the judicial killing of all these people (where still alive)?

Comments

Ritesh Agarwal said…
Good argument Sir. But the world doesn't share a single umbrella. It is unfortunate
2:59 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering Hiroshima, fight nuclear weapons, power and capitalism

Image
Remembering Hiroshima, fight nuclear weapons, power and capitalism Even if all the words about Hiroshima have been uttered, even if all the adjectives have been applied, it is not enough. For we have not yet removed the conditions that mak e Hiroshima and Nagasaki possible, even likely. It is right to remember Hiroshima on 6 August and Nagasaki on the 9th. But it is also necessary to remember the brutality of the imperialist war of which this was the culmination. When we remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki, we should also remember the Shoa, the death camps of Auschwitz and the rest. Even if we take the minimalist definition and split hairs between “Concentration Camps” and “Extermination Camps”, we get the following figures for the Nazis. Camp                                        Estimated deaths Auschwitz–Birkenau                    1,100,000 Bełżec                                          600,000 Chełmno                                      320,000 Majdanek                      
Read more

An Open Letter to Tariq Ali

Dear Tariq, When I was a very young radical, still a Maoist rather than a Trotskyist, it was your name, rather than that of Ernest Mandel, or of anyone else, that we came across, here in our part of India. There are still older comrades in West Bengal, who talk about a certain period of Fourth International history, in terms of “in those days of Tariq Ali”. This is why, a statement, even though signed by Chomsky, Zinn and others, along with the man who seems to have carried out the coup, a gentleman named Vijay Prashad, becomes most painful because you are among the signatories. As you once wrote in one of your wonderful books, about another comrade of yours, ‘there was fire in his belly in those days’. Perhaps we have all grown older, but some of us have refused to grow “wiser”. I read, and re-read, with a growing sense of wonder, shame and above all anger, the statement that some of you have signed. If you are uninformed, what gave you the authority to issue a pompous statement based
Read more

Arguments for Proportional Representation

Radical Socialist has issued an election stand that is online and will also be available in slightly condensed form in Bangla as a printed booklet. I propose to write briefly about many of our demands, and put them up as blogs and Facebook posts. . As we say, these are demands we will raise before, during and after the elections. The first of these calls for proportional representation. Such a demand faces two criticisms. One from the liberal and right, another from the left. The liberal and right opposition says that proportional representation weakens the government. To this our response is, bourgeois democracy claims it stands for accountability of government and MPs to the people. In that case, the First Past The Post System [FPTP] we have is bad. It ensures that big parties get disproportionate seats. It also ensures skewed representation. First Past The Post: A Route to Marginalising Smaller Parties In the 1962 Parliament, the undivided CPI had just under 10
Read more